<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transportation Can Be Counter-Intuitive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brokensidewalk.com/2009/07/22/transportation-can-be-counter-intuitive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brokensidewalk.com/2009/07/22/transportation-can-be-counter-intuitive/</link>
	<description>Covering Louisville Neighborhoods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:20:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Gillenwater</title>
		<link>http://brokensidewalk.com/2009/07/22/transportation-can-be-counter-intuitive/comment-page-1/#comment-9591</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Gillenwater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brokensidewalk.com/?p=5260#comment-9591</guid>
		<description>Branden&#039;s point about the grid providing multiple options is important. Our current interstate system and the ORBP unnecessarily concentrate autos in locations that aren&#039;t actually convenient to their destinations. By limiting connections with the grid and forcing everyone into the same space, they create traffic and congestion that wouldn&#039;t otherwise be there.

Because we&#039;re all typically headed to any number of destinations, traffic naturally wants to disperse but current and proposed ORBP designs will not allow it.

If I want go to 3rd St. and Branden wants to go to 6th St. and someone else wants to go to Shippingport, we all end up at the 9th St . exit and the streets immediately surrounding it, waiting in line and idling our motors, even though that&#039;s not where we want to go.

With greatly lessened cut through traffic and more grid connectivity, those downtown pinch spots should be reduced by the 8664 plan, allowing the grid to function as it was originally designed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Branden&#8217;s point about the grid providing multiple options is important. Our current interstate system and the ORBP unnecessarily concentrate autos in locations that aren&#8217;t actually convenient to their destinations. By limiting connections with the grid and forcing everyone into the same space, they create traffic and congestion that wouldn&#8217;t otherwise be there.</p>
<p>Because we&#8217;re all typically headed to any number of destinations, traffic naturally wants to disperse but current and proposed ORBP designs will not allow it.</p>
<p>If I want go to 3rd St. and Branden wants to go to 6th St. and someone else wants to go to Shippingport, we all end up at the 9th St . exit and the streets immediately surrounding it, waiting in line and idling our motors, even though that&#8217;s not where we want to go.</p>
<p>With greatly lessened cut through traffic and more grid connectivity, those downtown pinch spots should be reduced by the 8664 plan, allowing the grid to function as it was originally designed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Branden Klayko</title>
		<link>http://brokensidewalk.com/2009/07/22/transportation-can-be-counter-intuitive/comment-page-1/#comment-9589</link>
		<dc:creator>Branden Klayko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brokensidewalk.com/?p=5260#comment-9589</guid>
		<description>The existing grid won&#039;t be asked to handle all the highway traffic from I-64 Downtown.  It is operating at well under capacity now (I don&#039;t know much about the Chicago grid, so I can&#039;t compare the two) and it will have the help of a new east-west boulevard that can handle a substantial amount of traffic while being pleasant for a pedestrian.  I bring the grid into the discussion to show that there are multiple options available rather than just sitting on a single elevated road.  Much of the traffic will be rerouted on the new I-64 around the city and as evidenced from other highway-teardowns, it&#039;s acceptable to believe that some amount of traffic will simply disappear (which happened in San Francisco and Milwaukee, etc.) as superfluous trips are rerouted or abandoned by the individual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The existing grid won&#8217;t be asked to handle all the highway traffic from I-64 Downtown.  It is operating at well under capacity now (I don&#8217;t know much about the Chicago grid, so I can&#8217;t compare the two) and it will have the help of a new east-west boulevard that can handle a substantial amount of traffic while being pleasant for a pedestrian.  I bring the grid into the discussion to show that there are multiple options available rather than just sitting on a single elevated road.  Much of the traffic will be rerouted on the new I-64 around the city and as evidenced from other highway-teardowns, it&#8217;s acceptable to believe that some amount of traffic will simply disappear (which happened in San Francisco and Milwaukee, etc.) as superfluous trips are rerouted or abandoned by the individual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PointSpecial</title>
		<link>http://brokensidewalk.com/2009/07/22/transportation-can-be-counter-intuitive/comment-page-1/#comment-9587</link>
		<dc:creator>PointSpecial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brokensidewalk.com/?p=5260#comment-9587</guid>
		<description>One of your arguments doesn&#039;t exactly fly...

You cite the fact that Louisville&#039;s grid &quot;is an efficient distributor of traffic&quot; and &quot;On the street grid, you can easily choose another route through the grid at significantly more frequent intervals.&quot;

While these are true statements, there&#039;s a term that is transferred to highway traffic occasionally that originated with the grid: GRIDLOCK.  Chicago is about as &quot;griddy&quot; as it comes... and if you&#039;ve ever driven there on a Saturday night, you realize how, when the grid is full, noone moves.  There&#039;s no getting from point A to point B and it doesn&#039;t matter how many cross streets there are if it takes you 15 minutes to move a block.

I&#039;m not saying I&#039;m against this proposal... it seems much more logical to bipass the city than to simply expand  the thru-way for much of the traffic.  But you do have to account for the traffic once it gets to the grid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of your arguments doesn&#8217;t exactly fly&#8230;</p>
<p>You cite the fact that Louisville&#8217;s grid &#8220;is an efficient distributor of traffic&#8221; and &#8220;On the street grid, you can easily choose another route through the grid at significantly more frequent intervals.&#8221;</p>
<p>While these are true statements, there&#8217;s a term that is transferred to highway traffic occasionally that originated with the grid: GRIDLOCK.  Chicago is about as &#8220;griddy&#8221; as it comes&#8230; and if you&#8217;ve ever driven there on a Saturday night, you realize how, when the grid is full, noone moves.  There&#8217;s no getting from point A to point B and it doesn&#8217;t matter how many cross streets there are if it takes you 15 minutes to move a block.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying I&#8217;m against this proposal&#8230; it seems much more logical to bipass the city than to simply expand  the thru-way for much of the traffic.  But you do have to account for the traffic once it gets to the grid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Ernstberger</title>
		<link>http://brokensidewalk.com/2009/07/22/transportation-can-be-counter-intuitive/comment-page-1/#comment-9582</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Ernstberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brokensidewalk.com/?p=5260#comment-9582</guid>
		<description>All,
Aside from construction cost comparisons and obvious physical challenges offered  from various commentary I have read, the decision to suggest such a &quot;regressive&quot;  but entirely logical posture on the transporting of humans and cargo along the riverfront in Louisville is clearly an outward sign of rebellion against a systemic problem within our society....and is long overdue and heartily welcomed by this observer and student of design on the land!!   How many decades have we waited for  transportation solutions that build community, amplify appreciation for the natural places they transect, and marry construction to landform with graceful fluidity in a demonstration of artfully applied technical expertise....  all the while providing avenues for moving goods and citizens from one place to another?

I spent my childhood and teen years in Louisville, where dad was employed and where many ancestors did business years ago. I recall standing with pride on the Belvedere the year it was built, marveling at the view and experience it afforded...  How starved was the city even then, to connect, to overcome the massive barrier that resided just a few feet  below me making such an elevated construction  necessary?  And as a teen, how naive was I  to think the passage I-64 West made through Floyd Knobs just a few miles to the northwest of downtown was a marvel to be celebrated...instead of the grotesque gash in the landscape I see it as today. 
Call it what you like... new urbanism, old urbanism, or urbanism...there is nothing new about doing the right thing. 
I fully support the 8664 initiative...and I can think of dozens of similar  transportation  travesties in the nation I have 

How long will we permit speed, volume, and point a to point b thinking to sculpt an image and impact the personalty of our community?  That is the question. 
Moving more cars and cargo faster is one of many attributes to be considered in the rebuilding of I-64...but may not be the most important in the end.  It quite simply comes down to priorities....and leadership.    What should drive the end game transportation  issue for Louisville, anal or creative thinking?  Anal thinking produced the current situation, nationwide....we live daily with  the flaws in this approach.
It is time for the left brains to take a back seat and navigate while the right brains sit behind the wheel....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All,<br />
Aside from construction cost comparisons and obvious physical challenges offered  from various commentary I have read, the decision to suggest such a &#8220;regressive&#8221;  but entirely logical posture on the transporting of humans and cargo along the riverfront in Louisville is clearly an outward sign of rebellion against a systemic problem within our society&#8230;.and is long overdue and heartily welcomed by this observer and student of design on the land!!   How many decades have we waited for  transportation solutions that build community, amplify appreciation for the natural places they transect, and marry construction to landform with graceful fluidity in a demonstration of artfully applied technical expertise&#8230;.  all the while providing avenues for moving goods and citizens from one place to another?</p>
<p>I spent my childhood and teen years in Louisville, where dad was employed and where many ancestors did business years ago. I recall standing with pride on the Belvedere the year it was built, marveling at the view and experience it afforded&#8230;  How starved was the city even then, to connect, to overcome the massive barrier that resided just a few feet  below me making such an elevated construction  necessary?  And as a teen, how naive was I  to think the passage I-64 West made through Floyd Knobs just a few miles to the northwest of downtown was a marvel to be celebrated&#8230;instead of the grotesque gash in the landscape I see it as today.<br />
Call it what you like&#8230; new urbanism, old urbanism, or urbanism&#8230;there is nothing new about doing the right thing.<br />
I fully support the 8664 initiative&#8230;and I can think of dozens of similar  transportation  travesties in the nation I have </p>
<p>How long will we permit speed, volume, and point a to point b thinking to sculpt an image and impact the personalty of our community?  That is the question.<br />
Moving more cars and cargo faster is one of many attributes to be considered in the rebuilding of I-64&#8230;but may not be the most important in the end.  It quite simply comes down to priorities&#8230;.and leadership.    What should drive the end game transportation  issue for Louisville, anal or creative thinking?  Anal thinking produced the current situation, nationwide&#8230;.we live daily with  the flaws in this approach.<br />
It is time for the left brains to take a back seat and navigate while the right brains sit behind the wheel&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Wilson</title>
		<link>http://brokensidewalk.com/2009/07/22/transportation-can-be-counter-intuitive/comment-page-1/#comment-9578</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brokensidewalk.com/?p=5260#comment-9578</guid>
		<description>Joseph... these are the kinds of observations that need to be HEARD.

Steve... thanks for the invite. I&#039;ll join up. My only concern, as I find myself always thinking about so many things, is that we love to preach to the converted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph&#8230; these are the kinds of observations that need to be HEARD.</p>
<p>Steve&#8230; thanks for the invite. I&#8217;ll join up. My only concern, as I find myself always thinking about so many things, is that we love to preach to the converted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Ford</title>
		<link>http://brokensidewalk.com/2009/07/22/transportation-can-be-counter-intuitive/comment-page-1/#comment-9576</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brokensidewalk.com/?p=5260#comment-9576</guid>
		<description>I was born and raised in Louisville, moved away in 1988, and have returned to visit a couple of times every year since then. 

In more recent years I’ve observed the attempts to green up and otherwise revitalize the riverfront. In light of that, the proposal to significantly expand I-64 downtown seems like a schizophrenic effort. Louisville has spent the past 10+ years improving the waterfront only to now bury it under $4billion worth of concrete? 

In terms of its effect on the urban fabric, I-64 at downtown Louisville is one of the worst examples in the nation of the thoughtlessness of 60s and 70s-era interstate highway construction. It’s a shameful mistake it was ever built in the first place, and it should be demolished and relocated. 

To expand I-64 to the proposed degree is to permanently doom riverfront development as an urban revitalization strategy for Louisville. Someone once quipped that freeways are like sewers for cars and expanding I-64 would make an aboveground sewer the most prominent feature of downtown. 

Lastly, my own anecdotal observation of Louisville traffic congestion is that it does not warrant a massive expansion of highway infrastructure. I now live in a metro area with a population of close to 3,000,000, compared with Louisville’s ~1,300,000. Louisville’s highway infrastructure is much, much more developed. It has more highways with more lanes than a city with a population more than twice as large. It also has more and bigger main arterials (e.g.: Hurstbourne Lane, Shelbyville Road) which make cross-town travel much faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was born and raised in Louisville, moved away in 1988, and have returned to visit a couple of times every year since then. </p>
<p>In more recent years I’ve observed the attempts to green up and otherwise revitalize the riverfront. In light of that, the proposal to significantly expand I-64 downtown seems like a schizophrenic effort. Louisville has spent the past 10+ years improving the waterfront only to now bury it under $4billion worth of concrete? </p>
<p>In terms of its effect on the urban fabric, I-64 at downtown Louisville is one of the worst examples in the nation of the thoughtlessness of 60s and 70s-era interstate highway construction. It’s a shameful mistake it was ever built in the first place, and it should be demolished and relocated. </p>
<p>To expand I-64 to the proposed degree is to permanently doom riverfront development as an urban revitalization strategy for Louisville. Someone once quipped that freeways are like sewers for cars and expanding I-64 would make an aboveground sewer the most prominent feature of downtown. </p>
<p>Lastly, my own anecdotal observation of Louisville traffic congestion is that it does not warrant a massive expansion of highway infrastructure. I now live in a metro area with a population of close to 3,000,000, compared with Louisville’s ~1,300,000. Louisville’s highway infrastructure is much, much more developed. It has more highways with more lanes than a city with a population more than twice as large. It also has more and bigger main arterials (e.g.: Hurstbourne Lane, Shelbyville Road) which make cross-town travel much faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Magruder</title>
		<link>http://brokensidewalk.com/2009/07/22/transportation-can-be-counter-intuitive/comment-page-1/#comment-9572</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Magruder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brokensidewalk.com/?p=5260#comment-9572</guid>
		<description>Ken,

I likewise have been continuously alarmed at the apparent lack of a comprehensive, coherent political strategy not only with respect to 8664 but also with regards to dealing with the aspects of the ORBP that would be disadvantageous to the Louisville community.

Where is the outrage?  Well, I think I know the answer: It&#039;s a combination of ignorance, apathy and fear.  Ignorance, because most Louisvillians I think remain oblivious to many of the facts.  Apathy, because Louisvillians generally don&#039;t participate in the civic space as they should.  And fear, as I believe Louisvillians generally are afraid of going against the prevailing &quot;wisdom&quot; of the local commercial establishment.

As for a serious issues forum, I can&#039;t say that Louisville History &amp; Issues is a rip-roaring success at this point, but my goal is indeed to provided an environment where citizens in the area can come to discuss community issues without having to deal with so much riff-raff and nonsense.  I hope you can join us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken,</p>
<p>I likewise have been continuously alarmed at the apparent lack of a comprehensive, coherent political strategy not only with respect to 8664 but also with regards to dealing with the aspects of the ORBP that would be disadvantageous to the Louisville community.</p>
<p>Where is the outrage?  Well, I think I know the answer: It&#8217;s a combination of ignorance, apathy and fear.  Ignorance, because most Louisvillians I think remain oblivious to many of the facts.  Apathy, because Louisvillians generally don&#8217;t participate in the civic space as they should.  And fear, as I believe Louisvillians generally are afraid of going against the prevailing &#8220;wisdom&#8221; of the local commercial establishment.</p>
<p>As for a serious issues forum, I can&#8217;t say that Louisville History &amp; Issues is a rip-roaring success at this point, but my goal is indeed to provided an environment where citizens in the area can come to discuss community issues without having to deal with so much riff-raff and nonsense.  I hope you can join us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Wilson</title>
		<link>http://brokensidewalk.com/2009/07/22/transportation-can-be-counter-intuitive/comment-page-1/#comment-9571</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brokensidewalk.com/?p=5260#comment-9571</guid>
		<description>The evidence and logic that BS and Magruder keep presenting both excite and exasperate me. The whole New Urbanist  take on Louisville&#039;s future continues to be seen, if noticed at all, as the view of a marginalized, fringe group.  There are pockets of people and groups in Louisville  who agree with 8664 and are concerned with true placemaking, but I don&#039;t see them visible to the community as a whole. Where are the public, open, publicized meetings and rallies (admittedly tough to mount without seeming, well, silly and &#039;fringe&#039;)? Where are discussions and presentations where people from all over Louisville Metro are present? Where are the TV spots? Where are the online forums (I would love to see BS have a full-blown discussion area)? Where are coordinated blog efforts? I think, ultimately, it is visibility  - visibility with credibility - that is the problem here. 

I tried, by the way, to start a discussion about these issues on Louisville Hotbytes, but have been sabotaged by buffoons, and largely ignored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The evidence and logic that BS and Magruder keep presenting both excite and exasperate me. The whole New Urbanist  take on Louisville&#8217;s future continues to be seen, if noticed at all, as the view of a marginalized, fringe group.  There are pockets of people and groups in Louisville  who agree with 8664 and are concerned with true placemaking, but I don&#8217;t see them visible to the community as a whole. Where are the public, open, publicized meetings and rallies (admittedly tough to mount without seeming, well, silly and &#8216;fringe&#8217;)? Where are discussions and presentations where people from all over Louisville Metro are present? Where are the TV spots? Where are the online forums (I would love to see BS have a full-blown discussion area)? Where are coordinated blog efforts? I think, ultimately, it is visibility  &#8211; visibility with credibility &#8211; that is the problem here. </p>
<p>I tried, by the way, to start a discussion about these issues on Louisville Hotbytes, but have been sabotaged by buffoons, and largely ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Magruder</title>
		<link>http://brokensidewalk.com/2009/07/22/transportation-can-be-counter-intuitive/comment-page-1/#comment-9569</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Magruder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brokensidewalk.com/?p=5260#comment-9569</guid>
		<description>I echo corbballspieler&#039;s sentiment.  Great job in discussing the technical side of the bridges matter!

As readers may know, I have also been writing articles and making statements regarding the Ohio River Bridges Project and 8664 for several years, more on the political side of the matter, I suppose.

Also responding to the Courier-Journal&#039;s editorial of last Friday, I have written a new extended article.  It is entitled &quot;The Stench of the Lingering Question -- The Courier-Journal Editorial Board and Their Extreme Bias on the Bridges Matter&quot;.  Here&#039;s the link: http://www.historyandissues.org/louisville/viewtopic.php?t=1461</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I echo corbballspieler&#8217;s sentiment.  Great job in discussing the technical side of the bridges matter!</p>
<p>As readers may know, I have also been writing articles and making statements regarding the Ohio River Bridges Project and 8664 for several years, more on the political side of the matter, I suppose.</p>
<p>Also responding to the Courier-Journal&#8217;s editorial of last Friday, I have written a new extended article.  It is entitled &#8220;The Stench of the Lingering Question &#8212; The Courier-Journal Editorial Board and Their Extreme Bias on the Bridges Matter&#8221;.  Here&#8217;s the link: <a href="http://www.historyandissues.org/louisville/viewtopic.php?t=1461" rel="nofollow">http://www.historyandissues.org/louisville/viewtopic.php?t=1461</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corbballspieler</title>
		<link>http://brokensidewalk.com/2009/07/22/transportation-can-be-counter-intuitive/comment-page-1/#comment-9565</link>
		<dc:creator>corbballspieler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 06:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brokensidewalk.com/?p=5260#comment-9565</guid>
		<description>Thanks for another insightful post.  

The fact that Louisville&#039;s elected and de facto leaders fail to see the logic - much less the beauty - of the 8664 plan almost fills me with rage.

For someone considering moving back home to the &#039;Ville - if the ORBP goes forward in it&#039;s present form - I&#039;m going to stick with Chicago</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for another insightful post.  </p>
<p>The fact that Louisville&#8217;s elected and de facto leaders fail to see the logic &#8211; much less the beauty &#8211; of the 8664 plan almost fills me with rage.</p>
<p>For someone considering moving back home to the &#8216;Ville &#8211; if the ORBP goes forward in it&#8217;s present form &#8211; I&#8217;m going to stick with Chicago</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
