Snapshot: Liberty Green Community Center

Friday, February 26, 2010 by Branden Klayko.
Liberty Green Community Center (Photo courtesy Steve Wiser)

Liberty Green Community Center (Photo courtesy Steve Wiser)



Here’s a photo-update of the under-construction Liberty Green Community Center on the corner of Jefferson and Jackson Streets.  The building is Louisville Metro Housing Authority’s first LEED registered building.  The first three photos are just under a month old, so there’s likely more brick showing today, but I wanted to get these online before it was hopelessly too late.  Three more photos after the click show progress in mid-December.



Liberty Green Community Center (Photo courtesy Steve Wiser)

Liberty Green Community Center (Photo courtesy Steve Wiser)


Liberty Green Community Center (Photo courtesy Steve Wiser)

Liberty Green Community Center (Photo courtesy Steve Wiser)


Liberty Green Community Center (Photo courtesy Steve Wiser)

Liberty Green Community Center in December (Photo courtesy Steve Wiser)


Liberty Green Community Center (Photo courtesy Steve Wiser)

Liberty Green Community Center in December (Photo courtesy Steve Wiser)


Liberty Green Community Center (Photo courtesy Steve Wiser)

Liberty Green Community Center in December (Photo courtesy Steve Wiser)


4 Comments. Now we're talking!
  1. stanley collyer

    November 29th, 2010

    8:12 am

    Thumb up 0

    To describe the architecture of this building as “Romanesque” is very kind. Its architecture more closely resembles 1930s German architecture during the Nazi period. This is just another example of neo-traditional architecture promoted by this city government’s planning people that has part of our downtown looking like it was stuck back in the distant past. Hasn’t anyone noticed that we are in the 21st century?

  2. Porter Stevens

    December 18th, 2011

    7:06 pm

    Thumb up 0

    @stanley collyer – Right, because a generic glass and metal box would be an improvement. The thing about Louisville, Mr. Collyer, is that it is a city whose culture is based in tradition; tradition that has kept us from becoming Anywhere, USA. I see nothing wrong with architecture reflecting that.

  3. archintent

    December 20th, 2011

    8:20 am

    Thumb up 0

    i missed the part where mr collyer asked for a generic glass and metal box. also the part that indicates how this is more specific to traditions in louisville than to those in, say, boston, atlanta, or celebration, fla.

    this is a handsome building that will take its place in the city fabric. i’d argue that it’s not different from what might be built in “anywhere usa” because it references shared traditions of american architecture, but then it also isn’t attempting to be unique to louisville.

    one thing that *can* help a city build its specific and unique culture is when its architects are familiar with its local history, but also cognizant that part of their design job is to help the city’s fabric evolve in a way that is appropriate to the very particular time and circumstances in which they’re designing.

  4. Porter Stevens

    December 20th, 2011

    1:48 pm

    Thumb up 0

    @archintent – I cannot disagree with you. You must forgive me if my opinion seems crude, for it is an uneducated one that comes from simple observations I have made while driving around town. You are correct in saying that Mr. Collyer did not specifically ask for a glass and metal box. However, if the good people at liberty Green did opt for a modern design, I believe that would have been the result. Let the record show that I have nothing against GOOD modern architecture; there are numerous (too many to list here) modern skyscrapers that I consider to be beautiful and elegant designs. But to my eyes it seems that such quality flies out the window when it comes to small scale projects, and is replaced by the generic and largely ugly designs that can be found throughout suburbia. My apologies to Mr. Collyer if my comment was rude; I guess I just get mad when a tasteful example of neo-traditional architecture is unnecessarily criticized.

Join the Discussion. Leave a Response.

The information in the form below is required, but, don't fret, we won't share your information with anyone. Sometimes our spam protection software freaks out when you put a link in the comments, so if you don't see your response immediately, know it's being held for moderation. You can write whatever you want, but please keep to civil discourse. Ad hominem attacks and other such boondoggery will be removed. If you have any questions, you may peruse our comment policy.

 

We Support

  • streetsblog.net
  • Urban Design Studio
  • Preservation Louisville
  • Coalition for the Advancement of Regional Transportation
  • Bicycling for Louisville
  • Bike Louisville

Facebook

brokensidewalk.com © 2010 Broken Sidewalk. All rights reserved. Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
For content usage questions, please review our Copyright Policy or contact bs [at] brokensidewalk [dot] com.
Creative Commons License