Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Google+
Share on LinkedIn
Pin to Pinterest
Share on StumbleUpon
+

Build parking spaces and they will come—in cars. New research presented this week at the annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board finds a direct, causal relationship between the amount of parking in cities and car commuting rates.

University of Wisconsin researcher Chris McCahill and his team examined nine “medium-sized” cities with relatively stable populations between 100,000 and 300,000. They compared historical parking data with car commuting rates beginning in 1960, finding “a clear, consistent association” between parking levels and car commuting that has “grown stronger” over time.

Parking in Downtown Louisville. Red is surface parking, purple is single-use garages. (Erik Weber)
Parking in Downtown Louisville. Red is surface parking, purple is single-use garages. (Erik Weber)

Using an epidemiological research method, McCahill’s team determined that the relationship was causal. For example, data indicated that increases in parking tended to precede growth in car commuting.

The study brings home the point that by inflating the parking supply via minimum parking mandates and other policies, cities are leading more people to drive. This, in turn, makes conditions worse for transit, biking, and walking. It’s what you might call “social engineering.”

Cities like Hartford that added a lot of parking over the last few decades saw driving rates increase more than in cities where parking volumes stayed flatter. (Courtesy McCahill / TRB)
Cities like Hartford that added a lot of parking over the last few decades saw driving rates increase more than in cities where parking volumes stayed flatter. (Courtesy McCahill / TRB)

Researchers compared five cities with low car commuting rates (Arlington, Virginia; Berkeley, California; Silver Spring, Maryland; and Somerville and Cambridge, Massachusetts) to four cities with relatively high car commuting rates (Albany, New York; Lowell, Massachusetts; and New Haven and Hartford, Connecticut).

McCahill and his team found that for every 10 percentage point increase in parking spaces per capita, the share of workers commuting by car would be expected to increase by 7.7 percentage points. So if a city increased its per capita parking from 0.1 spaces to 0.5 spaces, car commute mode share would rise about 30 percentage points.

Interstate 65 with existing parking and abandoned lots. (Bing Maps / Montage by Broken Sidewalk)
Interstate 65 with existing parking and abandoned lots. (Bing Maps / Montage by Broken Sidewalk)

In Hartford, for instance, the number of parking spaces in the city increased from about 15,000 in 1960 to about 47,000 by 2000. The city’s solo car-commuting rate over that time rose more than 20 percentage points.

University of Connecticut Professor Norman Garrick, who co-authored the study, said the findings indicate it’s not in the interest of cities to continue to add parking.

“Adding parking in more traditional urban settings indeed has not worked out for cities,” he said. “The cities added parking out of fear that they would be losing all their trade to the suburbs. Almost all cities did some of that between 1960 and 1985. Some cities did it less. By 1985, cities like Cambridge had realized there was no benefit to doing this and they basically capped parking. Those cities have soared in terms of economic outcomes, in almost all measures of quality of life.”

[Editor’s Note: This article was cross-posted from Streetsblog USA.]
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Google+
Share on LinkedIn
Pin to Pinterest
Share on StumbleUpon
+
Angie Schmitt

Angie Schmitt

Reporter at StreetsBlog
Angie Schmitt is a newspaper reporter-turned planner/advocate who manages the Streetsblog Network from glamorous Cleveland, Ohio. She also writes about urban issues particular to the industrial Midwest at Rustwire.com.
Angie Schmitt

4 COMMENTS

  1. They need to outlaw those damned parking lots, they’re a blight on the city. Maybe the city can purchase them and either make them in to green spaces ( downtown sure is lacking already in green space ) or perhaps offer them to developers at a rate they cant turn down. Not sure what the City leaders are thinking but maybe they need to visit cities whose downtown’s are thriving to get a clue because Downtown Lou is pretty damned depressing

  2. What “City leaders” are thinking is that demolishing old buildings a paving the land entices developers to come along sometime and “develop”. What we need next in terms of research is something that either supports this theory or else debunks it.

Leave a Reply